MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998089632 · doi:10.1115/detc2013-13523

A Human-Inspired Method for Mobile Robot Navigation

2013· article· en· W1998089632 on OpenAlexaff
Fatemeh Heidari, Reza Fotouhi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobile robotComputer scienceMobile robot navigationRobotArtificial intelligenceComputer visionTerrainObstacle avoidanceDeadlockReal-time computingFuzzy logicRobot controlHuman–computer interactionDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method for real-time navigation of mobile robots in complex and mostly unstructured environment is presented. This novel human-inspired method (HIM) uses distance-based sensory data from a laser range finder for real-time navigation of a wheeled mobile robot in unknown and cluttered settings. The approach requires no prior knowledge from the environment and is easy to be implemented for real-time navigation of mobile robots. HIM endows the robot a human-like ability for reasoning about the situations to reach a predefined goal point while avoiding static and moving or unforeseen obstacles; this makes the proposed strategy efficient and effective. Results indicate that HIM is capable of creating smooth (no oscillations) paths for safely navigating the mobile robot, and coping with fluctuating and imprecise sensory data from uncertain environment. HIM specifies the best path ahead, according to the situation of encountered obstacles, preventing the robot to get trapped in deadlock and impassable conditions. This deadlock detection and avoidance is a significant ability of HIM. Also, this algorithm is designed to analyze the environment for detecting both negative and positive obstacles in off-road terrain. The simulation and experimental results of HIM is compared with a fuzzy logic based (FLB) approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207