MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998091781 · doi:10.1117/12.2004018

Organic photovoltaic cells based on photoactive bacteriorhodopsin proteins

2013· article· en· W1998091781 on OpenAlexafffund
Khaled M. Al-Aribe, George K. Knopf, Amarjeet Bassi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBacteriorhodopsinMonolayerAqueous solutionIndium tin oxideMaterials sciencePhotocurrentPhotoelectrochemical cellMembraneChemistryChemical engineeringNanotechnologyElectrolyteElectrodeOptoelectronicsThin filmOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advances in materials engineering have enabled photovoltaic (PV) cells to be fabricated from solid state semiconductors, photosensitive organic dyes, and photoactive proteins. One type of organic PV cell is based on the natural light-harvesting protein bacteriorhodopsin (bR) found in the plasma membrane of a salt marsh archaebacteria. When exposed to sunlight, each bR molecule acts as a simple proton pump which transports hydrogen ions from the cytoplasmic to the extracellular side through a transmembrane ion channel. Two types of bR-PV cells comprised of photosensitive dry and aqueous (wet) bR thin films are described in this paper. The self-assembled monolayer of oriented purple membrane (PM) patches from the bR protein is created on a bio-functionalized gold (Au) surface using a biotin molecular recognition technique. The dry bR monolayer is covered with an optically transparent Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) electrode to complete the dry bR-PV device. In contrast, the aqueous bR-PV cell is created by immobilizing the bR monolayer on an Au-coated porous substrate and then inserting the assembly between two micro-reservoirs filled with KCl solutions. Platinum wire probes are then inserted in the opposing liquid reserviors near the porous bR monolayer. The dry bR-PV cell generated a photo-electric response of 9.73 mV/cm<sup>2</sup>, while the aqueous bR-PV produced 41.7 mV/cm<sup>2</sup> and 33.3 &mu;A/cm<sup>2</sup>. Although the generated voltages appear small, it may be sufficient to power various microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) and microfluidic devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207