Raman spectroscopic studies of defect structures and phase transition in hyper-stoichiometric UO2+x
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A method to determine the defect structures in hyper-stoichiometric UO(2+x) using a combination of XRD and Raman spectroscopy has been developed. A sequence of phase transitions, from cubic to tetragonal symmetry, occurs with increasing degree of non-stoichiometry. This sequence proceeds from a cubic phase through an intermediate t''-type tetragonal (axial ratio c/a = 1) phase to a final t-type tetragonal (c/a not = 1) phase. Four distinct structural defect regions can be identified in the stoichiometry range, UO(2) to U(3)O(7): (i) a random point defect structure (x (in UO(2+x)) < or = 0.05); (ii) a non-stoichiometry region (0.05 < or = x < or = 0.15) over which point defects are gradually eliminated and replaced by the Willis 2:2:2 cluster; (iii) a mixture of Willis and cuboctahedral clusters (0.15 < or = x < or = 0.23); (iv) the cuboctahedral cluster (x > or = 0.23). The geometry and steric arrangement of these defects is primarily determined by the concentration of the excess-oxygen interstitials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".