Structure bidimensionnelle de l'attachement amoureux: Anxiété face à l'abandon et évitement de l'intimité.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brennan, Clark et Shaver (1998) ont developpe une mesure nommee « Experiences in Close Relationships » (ECR) a partir de l'ensemble des questionnaires existants de l'attachement adulte. Le present article traitede la traduction en langue francaise de l'instrument et propose deux etudes de validation de ce dernier realisees aupres d'adultes (N = 329) et de couples (N = 316) francophones. La premiere etude consiste a verifier la validite factorielle exploratoire et confirmatoire de la version francophone du ECR. L'analyse exploratoire demontre que 18 items mesurent la dimension evitement et 18 items mesurent la dimension anxiete. Les resultats d'analyses factorielles confirmatoires demontrent la valeur d'un modele a deux paliers. Ce dernier comporte huit composantes de premier ordre de l'attachement amoureux qui sont reliees a deux dimensions de second ordre, c'est-a-dire l'evitement des rapports intimes et l'anxiete face a l'abandon. La seconde etude permet de contre valider cette structure en deux paliers aupres de couples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".