MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998144601 · doi:10.1577/t06-174.1

Intertidal Habitat Use, Population Characteristics, Movement, and Exploitation of Striped Bass in the Inner Bay of Fundy, Canada

2008· article· en· W1998144601 on OpenAlexaffabout
Roger A. Rulifson, Sean Andrew McKenna, Michael J. Dadswell

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Fisheries Society · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Marine Fisheries ServiceEast Carolina UniversityHudson River Foundation
KeywordsBayFisheryBass (fish)OceanographyPopulationShoreTrawlingGeographyIntertidal zoneEnvironmental scienceFishingGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Striped bass Morone saxatilis were sampled from intertidal weirs in Minas Basin and Cobequid Bay, Bay of Fundy, to determine tidal behavior, population characteristics, movements, and exploitation. During 1985 and 1986, 1,864 striped bass ranging from 69 to more than 600 mm in fork length were captured in three commercial weirs from May to December along the north shore of Minas Basin and Cobequid Bay. Catches were lowest during early summer and highest in late summer and fall. Catches were greatest when low tide occurred from dusk to midnight (1800-2400 hours), a second peak being observed when low tide occurred from dawn to late morning. Largest weir catches at a clear-water site (Minas Basin) were associated with spring tides (0.5-0.9 m above mean low water [MLW]), but at turbid water sites (Cobequid Bay) the best catches were during neap tides (1.0-1.7 m above MLW). The largest striped bass were captured from June to August (280-610 mm), but age-0 (69-94-mm) and age-1 (141-240-mm) fish dominated the catches in September and October. A total of 1,431 striped bass were marked: 1,163 in 1985 and 268 in 1986. The recapture rate was 21.3% for fish released in 1985 and 8.9% for those released in 1986; 55.8% were recreational recaptures, and 44.2% came from commercial fisheries. The mean day of recapture from all sources (recreational and commercial) in marine waters of the Bay of Fundy was September 3, but for striped bass recaptured in local, freshwater overwintering sites it was May 21. The average distance moved for striped bass recaptured in Minas Basin and local watersheds was 55 km, and for long-distance movement it was 780 km. Tags were returned from Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Virginia. All tag returns from outside Minas Basin were from fish larger than 390 mm at time of release. The fastest travel time was 17.8 km/d by a fish recaptured in Rhode Island 45 d after release. Our findings demonstrate that the striped bass frequenting Minas Basin and Cobequid Bay each summer consist of a portion that overwinters in freshwater around the Bay of Fundy and a portion that migrates southward along the eastern coast of the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Fisheries SocietySame topicMarine and fisheries researchFrench-language works237,207