Roughening Due to Ink Jet Rewetting: Effect of Paper Treatment and Composition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An ink jet printer was used to deliver small quantities of ink-dyed water to laboratory handsheets having a range of compositions and treatments. An optical profilometer recorded initial and final roughness statistics at fixed locations on the printed surfaces. For paper made with chemical pulp, it was found that the relative change in local roughness after rewetting (change in roughness divided by initial roughness, ΔRa/Rao) increased with the degree of calendering, beating, and the amount of surface and internal sizing. The corresponding changes in skewness and kurtosis after rewetting reflected the development of increased fiber rising. Increasing amounts of surface sizing produced larger ΔRa/Rao, corresponding to an increase in the ink penetration depth. Rewetting produced the greatest ΔRa/Rao in paper manufactured with mechanical pulp, with ΔRa/Rao becoming smaller as the fraction of chemical pulp was increased to 0.4, after which it became insensitive to composition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it