MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998186731 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638052

A nonlinear dictionary for image reconstruction

2013· article· en· W1998186731 on OpenAlexaff
Mathiruban Tharmalingam, Kaamran Raahemifar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscrete cosine transformComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSparse approximationPattern recognition (psychology)K-SVDTransform codingNeural codingData compressionCoding (social sciences)Representation (politics)Speech recognitionImage (mathematics)Computer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Complex signals such as images, audio and video recordings can be represented by a large over complete dictionary without distinguishable compromise on the representation quality. Large over complete dictionaries with more patterns can be used to increase the sparse coding as well as provide significant improvements in signal representation quality. The use of the over-complete dictionaries and sparse coding has been successfully applied in compression, de-noising, and pattern recognition applications within the last few decades. One particular dictionary, the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) dictionary has seen a great deal of success in image processing applications. However, we propose a novel non-linear over-complete dictionary that is sparser than the DCT dictionary while improving the quality of the signal representation. The proposed non-linear dictionary has demonstrated through experimental results to be superior to the DCT dictionary by achieving higher signal to noise ratio (SNR) in the reconstructed images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207