MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998245044 · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65641-8

SMOKING AND ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION: EVIDENCE BASED ANALYSIS

2001· article· en· W1998245044 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsErectile dysfunctionMedicineEndothelial dysfunctionDiseaseInternal medicineCoronary artery diseaseSmoking cessationIntensive care medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: We examined available evidence concerning the role of smoking in the development of erectile dysfunction. This task involved a complete review of the smoking literature as it pertained to erectile dysfunction and select endothelial diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We comprehensively reviewed the literature, including PubMed and recent abstract proceedings from national meetings relevant to smoking, erectile dysfunction and endothelial diseases. The quality of the evidence was assessed by methods used to develop clinical practice guidelines. Our review involved an objective evaluation of the basic science literature and clinical studies. When necessary, we examined studies of endothelial diseases other than erectile dysfunction because of obvious gaps in the literature. RESULTS: There are strong parallels and shared risks among smoking, coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis and erectile dysfunction. Clinical and basic science studies provide strong indirect evidence that smoking may affect penile erection by the impairment of endothelium dependent smooth muscle relaxation. The association of erectile dysfunction with risk factors such as coronary artery disease and hypertension appears to be amplified by cigarette smoking. Smoking may increase the likelihood of moderate or complete erectile dysfunction 2-fold. The prevalence of erectile dysfunction in former smokers was no different from that in individuals who had never smoked, implying that smoking cessation may decrease the risk of erectile dysfunction. Case studies and retrospective series have shown an association of smoking with erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence on the association of smoking with erectile dysfunction is not complete insofar as association linking factors are concerned. However, the evidence of such an association is likely due to the consistency of the relationship of smoking and endothelial disease, and the strength of the association of erectile dysfunction with other endothelial diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it