MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998249305 · doi:10.1139/x03-025

Genetic structure of<i>Acer platanoides</i>and<i>Betula pendula</i>in northern Europe

2003· article· en· W1998249305 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany and Plant Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSNS Nordic Forest Research
KeywordsBetula pendulaBiologyBotanyBiological dispersalTemperate climateLoss of heterozygosityAllelePopulationDemographyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marker variation was measured in 12 Acer platanoides L. and 9 Betula pendula Roth populations using 11 and 18 allozyme loci, respectively. Both species grow in the boreal–temperate zone. Insect-pollinated A. platanoides with limited seed dispersal has a scattered occurrence, while wind-pollinated B. pendula with light wind-dispersed seeds has a more continuous distribution. The average expected heterozygosity was 0.132 for A. platanoides and 0.141 for B. pendula. Genetic differentiation among A. platanoides populations (F st = 0.099) was higher than that of B. pendula (F st = 0.032). Expected heterozygosities in marginal and central populations of A. platanoides were at approximately the same level. Contrary to the expectation, differentiation was higher among central populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it