MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998249305 · doi:10.1139/x03-025

Genetic structure of<i>Acer platanoides</i>and<i>Betula pendula</i>in northern Europe

2003· article· en· W1998249305 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mari Rusanen, Pekka Vakkari, Åsa Blom

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany and Plant Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSNS Nordic Forest Research
KeywordsBetula pendulaBiologyBotanyBiological dispersalTemperate climateLoss of heterozygosityAllelePopulationDemographyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marker variation was measured in 12 Acer platanoides L. and 9 Betula pendula Roth populations using 11 and 18 allozyme loci, respectively. Both species grow in the boreal–temperate zone. Insect-pollinated A. platanoides with limited seed dispersal has a scattered occurrence, while wind-pollinated B. pendula with light wind-dispersed seeds has a more continuous distribution. The average expected heterozygosity was 0.132 for A. platanoides and 0.141 for B. pendula. Genetic differentiation among A. platanoides populations (Fst= 0.099) was higher than that of B. pendula (Fst= 0.032). Expected heterozygosities in marginal and central populations of A. platanoides were at approximately the same level. Contrary to the expectation, differentiation was higher among central populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207