MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998282843 · doi:10.1063/1.2194903

Equilibrium conformational dynamics of a polymer in a solvent

2006· article· en· W1998282843 on OpenAlexaff
James M. Polson, John P. Gallant

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalingAutocorrelationExponentPolymerMolecular dynamicsStatistical physicsThermodynamicsChain (unit)MonomerPhysicsChemistryMaterials scienceChemical physicsComputational chemistryMathematicsQuantum mechanicsNuclear magnetic resonanceStatisticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molecular dynamics simulations were used to study the conformational dynamics of a bead-spring model polymer in an explicit solvent under good solvent conditions. The dynamics of the polymer chain were investigated using an analysis of the time autocorrelation functions of the Rouse coordinates of the polymer chain. We have investigated the variation of the correlation functions with polymer chain length N, solvent density rho, and system size. The measured initial decay rates gamma(p) of the correlation functions were compared with the predictions from a theory of polymer dynamics which uses the Oseen tensor to describe hydrodynamic interactions between monomers. Over the range of chain lengths considered (N = 30-60 monomers), the predicted scaling of gamma(p) proportional to N(-3nu) was observed at high rho, where nu is the polymer scaling exponent. The predicted gamma(p) are generally higher than the measured values. This discrepancy increases with decreasing rho, as a result in the breakdown in the conditions required for the Oseen approximation. The agreement between theory and simulation at high rho improves considerably if the theoretical expression for gamma(p) is modified to avoid sum-to-integral approximations, and if the values of (R(p)2), which are used in the theory, are taken directly from the simulation rather than being calculated using approximate scaling relations. The observed finite-size scaling of gamma(p) is not quantitatively consistent with the theoretical predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207