Bundling and Aggregation of DNA by Cationic Dendrimers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dendrimers are unique synthetic macromolecules of nanometer dimensions with a highly branched structure and globular shape. Among dendrimers, polyamidoamine (PAMAM) have received most attention as potential transfection agents for gene delivery, because these macromolecules bind DNA at physiological pH. The aim of this study was to examine the interaction of calf-thymus DNA with several dendrimers of different compositions, such as mPEG-PAMAM (G3), mPEG-PAMAM (G4), and PAMAM (G4) at physiological conditions, using constant DNA concentration and various dendrimer contents. FTIR, UV-visible, and CD spectroscopic methods, as well as atomic force microscopy (AFM), were used to analyze the macromolecule binding mode, the binding constant, and the effects of dendrimer complexation on DNA stability, aggregation, condensation, and conformation. Structural analysis showed a strong dendrimer-DNA interaction via major and minor grooves and the backbone phosphate group with overall binding constants of K(mPEG-G3) = 1.5 (±0.5) × 10(3) M(-1), K(mPEG-G4) = 3.4 (±0.80) × 10(3) M(-1), and K(PAMAM-G4) = 8.2 (±0.90) × 10(4) M(-1). The order of stability of polymer-DNA complexation is PAMAM-G4 > mPEG-G4 > mPEG-G3. Both hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions were observed for dendrimer-DNA complexes. DNA remained in the B-family structure, while biopolymer particle formation and condensation occurred at high dendrimer concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it