Dynamics of Dense Suspensions of Star‐Like Micelles with Responsive Fixed Cores
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Summary: PBMA‐PCEMA block copolymer micelles, consisting of poly(2‐cinnamoyloxyethyl methacrylate) (PCEMA) cross‐linked core and poly(butyl methacrylate) (PBMA) hairs (shell), are used as model responsive soft colloids, where the core swelling can be tuned by changing solvent quality. Our extensive dynamic light scattering study, complemented by viscosity and small angle neutron scattering (SANS) measurements, demonstrates the richness of dynamics of such dense micellar suspensions and in particular the strong influence of solvent‐mediated core swelling on the concentration dependence of the self‐diffusion. Brownian dynamics (BD) simulations using appropriate effective core‐core interactions support these findings. Such novel micelles offer new possibilities for controlling the interactions and macroscopic properties of colloidal suspensions. The self‐diffusion coefficient D for core‐shell particles, as calculated from the Brownian dynamics simulations. magnified image The self‐diffusion coefficient D for core‐shell particles, as calculated from the Brownian dynamics simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".