Detection, isolation, and stimulation of quiescent primitive leukemic progenitor cells from patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although many acute myeloid leukemia (AML) colony-forming cells (CFCs) and long-term culture-initiating cells (LTC-ICs) directly isolated from patients are actively cycling, quiescent progenitors are present in most samples. In the current study, (3)H-thymidine ((3)H-Tdr) suicide assays demonstrated that most NOD/SCID mouse leukemia-initiating cells (NOD/SL-ICs) are quiescent in 6 of 7 AML samples. AML cells in G(0), G(1), and S/G(2)+M were isolated from 4 of these samples using Hoechst 33342/pyroninY staining and cell sorting. The progenitor content of each subpopulation was consistent with the (3)H-Tdr suicide results, with NOD/SL-ICs found almost exclusively among G(0) cells while the cycling status of AML CFCs and LTC-ICs was more heterogeneous. Interestingly, after 72 hours in serum-free culture with or without Steel factor (SF), Flt-3 ligand (FL), and interleukin-3 (IL-3), most G(0) AML cells entered active cell cycle (percentage of AML cells remaining in G(0) at 72 hours, 1.2% to 37%, and 0% to 7.6% in cultures without and with growth factors [GFs], respectively) while G(0) cells from normal lineage-depleted bone marrow remained quiescent in the absence of GF. All 4 AML samples showed evidence of autocrine production of 2 or more of SF, FL, IL-3, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). In addition, 3 of 4 samples contained an internal tandem duplication of the FLT3 gene. In summary, quiescent leukemic cells, including NOD/SL-ICs, are present in most AML patients. Their spontaneous entry into active cell cycle in short-term culture might be explained by the deregulated GF signaling present in many AMLs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".