MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998330173 · doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2013.7b5

Increase in Off-Label Antipsychotic Use Seen in Canadian Youth

2013· article· en· W1998330173 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jun Yan

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical prescriptionAntipsychoticMedicinePsychiatryOff-label usePediatricsFamily medicineSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)DemographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Professional NewsFull AccessIncrease in Off-Label Antipsychotic Use Seen in Canadian YouthJun YanJun YanPublished Online:20 Jul 2013https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2013.7b5AbstractResearchers sound an alarm on the "exponential rise" in antipsychotic prescriptions for children and adolescents and urge closer monitoring of prescribing practices.The number of children and adolescents aged 18 and younger who were prescribed a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) increased by 18 times from 1996 to 2010 in British Columbia, according to findings published in the June Canadian Journal of Psychiatry.The authors collected prescription information from the province's health registry on all outpatient data, which also links most prescriptions to diagnoses and to the types of physicians who wrote the prescriptions. They found that 0.33 youth per 1,000 received an SGA prescription in Canada's 1996 fiscal year (April 1, 1996 to March 31, 1997), while 5.98 youth per 1,000 did so in the 2010 fiscal year. A very different trend characterized use of first-generation antipsychotics, which dropped from 1.43 per 1,000 youth in 1996 to 0.46 per 1,000 in 2010. Overall, the number of youth receiving antipsychotics increased nearly fourfold from 1.66 per 1,000 to 6.37 per 1,000 (see graph).The rise was primarily driven by prescription increases in both male and female adolescents aged 13 to 18 and in boys aged 6 to 12, with the average numbers of patients receiving antipsychotic prescriptions up by 3.7 to 4.4 times. Antipsychotic prescriptions for girls aged 12 and younger and boys aged 5 and younger remained relatively flat. In 2010, the most common diagnoses linked to pediatric antipsychotic prescriptions were depressive disorders, hyperkinetic syndrome of childhood (including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD]), and neurotic disorders (including anxiety, dissociative, phobic, and obsessive-compulsive disorders). Antipsychotics have not been approved by Health Canada for most of these indications in children, the authors stated.Psychiatrists were the largest category of physicians to write an antipsychotic prescription for children and adolescents, accounting for 38.6 percent of first-time antipsychotic prescriptions in 2010, followed by general practitioners, who prescribed 34.3 percent. Pediatricians prescribed 15.6 percent of the antipsychotics for this population. Efforts should be made to "disseminate the results of this and other epidemiologic research about the high prevalence of metabolic complications of SGAs to key stakeholders, specifically the highest prescribers in children and youth: psychiatrists, family physicians, and pediatricians," Constadina Panagiotopolous, M.D., the study's senior author, told Psychiatric News. "We have been funded to develop an online interactive module…as an educational resource for evidence-based prescribing as well as to raise awareness of recently published Canadian guidelines for monitoring and management of metabolic complications in children and youth prescribed SGAs."Panagiotopoulos is an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of British Columbia and an endocrinologist at British Columbia Children's Hospital."When antipsychotics are prescribed for children, there is always a concern about balancing the benefits and the risks, such as weight increase, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and tardive dyskinesia," Louis Kraus, M.D., a professor of child and adolescent psychiatry at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago and chair of APA's Council on Children, Adolescents, and Their Families, commented to Psychiatric News. "The rise in SGA prescriptions in pediatric patients parallels the trend in adult patients during the same period." Kraus pointed out that the Canadian study included 18-year-olds in the analysis, a group that is considered adults in the United States. Most of the antipsychotic drugs have been approved in the United States as adjunct treatment for refractory depression in adults. He also noted that there is clinical and research evidence to support the efficacy of antipsychotics to treat refractory depression, tic disorder, severe behavioral symptoms, and mood disorders with psychotic features in younger patients. Some SGAs have been approved in the United States to treat behavioral symptoms in children with autism. "The reality is that many medications we use are off label, but it doesn't mean we shouldn't use them," Kraus said. The AMA supports clinical decisions to use medications off label to help patients, as long as the risks and benefits are carefully considered, and patients or their guardians understand that the medication is used off-label." "In these patients [who may benefit from antipsychotics], the clinical presentation is often complicated," Kraus noted. "We have to be very conservative in using antipsychotics for children." Considering that data show many of these prescriptions were written by nonpsychiatrists, "I strongly recommend that family physicians and pediatricians consider getting a consultation with a child and adolescent psychiatrist to review the diagnosis and obtain appropriate informed consent with the patient and/or guardian before prescribing antipsychotics for children," he urged.The study was funded by the British Columbia Mental Health and Addiction Services and the Child and Family Research Institute, a network of medical and research institutions in Western Canada. ■An abstract of "A Population-Based Study of Antipsychotic Prescription Trends in Children and Adolescents in British Columbia, From 1996 to 2011" is posted at http://publications.cpa-apc.org/browse/documents/598. ISSUES NewArchived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatric NewsSame topicPharmaceutical studies and practicesFrench-language works237,207