Impact de la forme de la reprise sur les réactions des stakeholders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le cadre d’une transmission, les partenaires de la firme supportent des incertitudes sur les performances présentes et futures de l’entreprise cédée. Dans cette situation, ils peuvent revoir à la baisse leur évaluation a priori de la qualité de la firme et développer des comportements de précaution qui pénalisent le repreneur. L’objet de cet article e d’étudier l’impact de la forme de la reprise, interne ou externe, sur les réactions l’environnement. Nous montrons, à partir de tests réalisés sur les données SINE de l’INSEE, que l’environnement réagit de manière plus favorable lorsque la reprise est interne et que, dès lors que le repreneur travaillait dans l’entreprise reprise, la reprise familiale domine toute autre forme de transmission. Nous justifions ces résultats en mettant en exergue la nature de l’information transmise selon le type de reprise et nous apprécions, à la lumière de ces résultats, les dernières mesures prises en faveur de la transmission d’entreprise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.037 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".