MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998343879 · doi:10.1063/1.3499293

Low temperature electrostatic force microscopy of a deep two-dimensional electron gas using a quartz tuning fork

2010· article· en· W1998343879 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMechanical and Optical Resonators
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTuning forkQuartzCapacitive sensingCapacitive couplingElectric fieldCoupling (piping)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionMagnetic fieldScanning electron microscope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using an ultralow temperature, high magnetic field scanning probe microscope, we have measured electric potentials of a deeply buried two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG). Relying on the capacitive coupling between the 2DEG and a resonant tip/cantilever structure, we can extract electrostatic potential information of the 2DEG from the dynamics of the oscillator. We present measurements using a quartz tuning fork oscillator and a 2DEG with a cleaved edge overgrowth structure. The sensitivity of the quartz tuning fork as force sensor is demonstrated by observation of Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations at a large tip-2DEG separation distance of more than 500 nm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicMechanical and Optical ResonatorsFrench-language works237,207