Mechanisms of cardiodepression by an Na<sup>+</sup>–H<sup>+</sup>exchange inhibitor methyl-<i>N</i>-isobutyl amiloride (MIA) on the heart: lack of beneficial effects in ischemia–reperfusion injuryThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled Young Investigators' Forum.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although Na+-H+ exchange (NHE) inhibitors such as methyl-N-isobutyl amiloride (MIA) are known to depress the cardiac function, the mechanisms of their negative inotropic effect are not completely understood. In this study, isolated rat hearts were perfused with MIA to study its action on cardiac performance, whereas isolated subcellular organelles such as sarcolemma, myofibrils, sarcoplasmic reticulum, and mitochondria were treated with MIA to determine its effect on their function. The effect of MIA on intracellular Ca2+ mobilization was examined in fura-2-AM-loaded cardiomyocytes. MIA was observed to depress cardiac function in a concentration-dependent manner in HCO3- -free buffer. On the other hand, MIA had an initial positive inotropic effect followed by a negative inotropic effect in HCO3-containing buffer. MIA increased the basal concentration of intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) and augmented the KCl-mediated increase in [Ca2+]i. MIA did not show any direct effect on myofibrils, sarcolemma, and sarcoplasmic reticulum ATPase activities; however, this agent was found to decrease the intracellular pH, which reduced the myofibrils Ca2+-stimulated ATPase activity. MIA also increased Ca2+ uptake by mitochondria without having any direct effect on sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ uptake. In addition, MIA did not protect the hearts subjected to mild Ca2+ paradox as well as ischemia-reperfusion-mediated injury. These results suggest that the increase in [Ca2+]i in cardiomyocytes may be responsible for the initial positive inotropic effect of MIA, but its negative inotropic action may be due to mitochondrial Ca2+ overloading as well as indirect depression of myofibrillar Ca2+ ATPase activity. Thus the accumulation of [H+]i as well as occurrence of intracellular and mitochondrial Ca2+ overload may explain the lack of beneficial effects of MIA in preventing the ischemia-reperfusion-induced myocardial injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".