MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998402566 · doi:10.1139/w06-047

The constant gene <i>orf14.9</i>, which belongs to the variable <i>eps</i> (exopolysaccharide) cluster, is involved in the cell growth of <i>Streptococcus thermophilus</i>

2006· article· en· W1998402566 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guillaume Tyvaert, Catherine Morel, Jean‐Pierre Joly, Bernard Decaris, Florence Charron-Bourgoin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStreptococcus thermophilusMicrobiologyConstant (computer programming)Gene clusterBiologyCluster (spacecraft)Streptococcus pneumoniaeGeneBacteriaGeneticsLactobacillus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Streptococcus thermophilus, the eps clusters involved in exopolysaccharide (EPS) biosynthesis are very polymorphic, nevertheless they all contain a highly conserved sequence corresponding to that of orf14.9. This open reading frame (ORF) is transcribed in a reverse direction with respect to eps genes. Amino acid sequence analysis showed a possible transmembrane location of the putative Orf14.9 protein but did not permit a proposed function. Insertional mutants of orf14.9 were obtained in strains NST2280 and A054 of S. thermophilus. EPS yields of these mutants are similar to those of their respective wild strains, suggesting that orf14.9 does not modify the quantity of produced EPS. Growth parameter determination for wild strains and their respective mutants showed that orf14.9 is involved in the cell growth of S. thermophilus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicStreptococcal Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207