Modeling Process-Induced Cell Damage in the Biodispensing Process
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emerging biomanufacturing processes involve incorporation of living cells into various processes and systems by employing different cell manipulation techniques. Among them, biodispensing, in which the cell suspension is extruded via a fine needle under pressurized air, is a promising technique because of its high efficiency. Cells in this process are continually subjected to mechanical forces and may be damaged if the force or manipulation time exceeds certain levels. Modeling cell injury incurred in these processes is lacking in the literature. This article presents a method to quantify the force-induced cell damage in the biodispensing process. This method consists of two steps: first is to establish cell damage laws to relate cell damage to hydrostatic pressure/shear stress; and the second is to represent the process-induced forces experienced by cells during the biodispensing process and apply the established cell damage law to represent the percentage of cell damage. Schwann cells and 3T3 fibroblasts were used to validate the model and the comparisons of experimental and simulation results show the effectiveness of the method presented in this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it