MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998442438 · doi:10.1109/icif.2010.5712021

A novel interacting multiple model method for nonlinear target tracking

2010· article· en· W1998442438 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Control theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemExtended Kalman filterKalman filterComputer scienceParticle filterFilter (signal processing)Tracking (education)Control (management)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The state estimation of targets is a difficult task, particularly if the target exhibits nonlinear behaviour, which is often the case. Currently, the most popular filters used in target tracking are the Kalman filter (KF) and its various forms, as well as the particle filter (PF). Introduced in 2007, the smooth variable structure filter (SVSF) is a relatively new predictor-corrector method based on sliding mode estimation. In the past, this filter has been used successfully for the state and parameter estimation of mechanical and electrical systems for the purpose of control. This paper introduces a new interacting multiple model (IMM) method that makes use of the SVSF estimation strategy. An air traffic control (ATC) problem is used to compare the common EKF-IMM with the proposed SVSF-IMM in terms of tracking accuracy, robustness, and computational complexity. Furthermore, this paper demonstrates that the SVSF is an effective method for nonlinear target tracking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it