MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998466980 · doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.138800

Electrophysiological effects of intravitreal Avastin (bevacizumab) in the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration

2008· article· en· W1998466980 on OpenAlexaff
Rustum Karanjia, Kenneth T. Eng, Jeffrey Gale, Sanjay Sharma, Martin ten Hove

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Ophthalmology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMacular degenerationBevacizumabOphthalmologySurgeryChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To examine the sensitivity of the multifocal electroretinogram (mf-ERG) at measuring changes in retinal electrical activity in response to Avastin (bevacizumab) treatment for age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). METHODS: Nine subjects with exudative ARMD, not previously treated with bevacizumab in the investigated eye, underwent pretreatment testing with mf-ERG and intravenous fluorescein angiography (IVFA). A second mf-ERG test was conducted post-treatment. The P1 response amplitudes were examined for the hexagons corresponding to areas of pathology on the IVFA. Intertest variability was accounted for by examining areas without pathology. Aggregate responses were also generated for central and lesion-associated responses. RESULTS: Changes in P1 response amplitude correlated with changes in visual acuity (R(2)>0.96). An improvement in Snellen visual acuity correlated with a significant improvement in P1 response amplitude from lesion associated recordings (p<0.03). Changes in P1 response amplitudes were not observed when aggregate responses were generated. CONCLUSION: This study represents a novel method for assessing an improvement of mf-ERG responses. This is the first study to demonstrate a statistically significant change in retinal electrical activity postbevacizumab in patients with ARMD. This study demonstrates a method for utilising mf-ERG to assess changes in retinal electrical activity and to assess the effectiveness of treatments such as bevacizumab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of OphthalmologySame topicRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207