MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998518575 · doi:10.1093/imamat/hxr004

Macroscopic transport models for rarefied gas flows: a brief review

2011· review· en· W1998518575 on OpenAlexaffabout
Henning Struchtrup, Peyman Taheri

Bibliographic record

VenueIMA Journal of Applied Mathematics · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceOperations researchHistoryEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient modelling of gas microflows requires accurate, yet fast to solve, models. For finite but moderate Knudsen numbers, extended macroscopic transport equations offer an alternative to the Boltzmann equation, from which they are derived. Classical and modern approaches for the derivation of these models are reviewed, and the resulting equations are compared for their ability to describe the multitude of known rarefaction phenomena. Among the equations discussed are the Burnett and super-Burnett equations, Grad’s 13 moment equations, and the regularized 13 and 26 moment equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIMA Journal of Applied MathematicsSame topicGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryFrench-language works237,207