MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998519734 · doi:10.1021/cm060265y

Synthesis of MCM-48 Silica Using a Gemini Surfactant with a Rigid Spacer

2006· article· en· W1998519734 on OpenAlexafffund
Krystyna Czechura, Abdelhamid Sayari

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMesoporous Materials and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMesophasePulmonary surfactantPolymerizationMaterials sciencePrecipitationAdsorptionPhase (matter)Chemical engineeringMCM-41SilicatePolymer chemistryChemistryOrganic chemistryPolymerComposite materialMolecular sieve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gemini surfactant p -phenylenedimethylenebis( n -hexadecyldimethylammonium) dibromide (abbreviated C 16 -DMB-C 16, with DMB = p -CH 2 C 4 H 6 CH 2 ) with a rigid spacer was found to produce cubic MCM-48 silica mesophase by temperature-induced phase transition from the MCM-41 hexagonal phase. The synthesis involved two steps, a precipitation stage at room temperature for a period of time t 1, followed by an aging step at higher temperature for a period of time t 2 . The synthesis was optimized for particular combinations of t 1 and t 2 periods. The phase transformation was studied under various pH and temperature conditions. Although it was observed that ethanol partitioning induced, at least partially, the formation of the cubic structure, the transformation was also shown to be influenced by the degree of silicate polymerization. The MCM-48 silica prepared under optimized conditions exhibited a type IV nitrogen adsorption isotherm, a BET surface area of 1164 m 2 /g, and a narrow pore size distribution with a maximum at 2.5 nm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicMesoporous Materials and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207