MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998520818 · doi:10.1139/l07-138

Effect of jet aeration on hydrodynamic forces on plunge pool floors

2008· article· en· W1998520818 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerationDimensionless quantityBuoyancyMechanicsJet (fluid)Froude numberEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringPhysicsGeologyChemistryFlow (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of jet aeration on the mean hydrodynamic forces applied on plunge pool floors was investigated. A mathematical expression is proposed to estimate the buoyancy coefficient reflecting the aeration effect, including contributions from previous authors. A correction of the theoretical values resulting from this expression based on data obtained in an experimental setup with vertical submerged rectangular (two-dimensional) aerated jets is proposed. The effect of the buoyancy coefficient is introduced in the integration of the hydrodynamic pressures over slabs of the plunge pool floor. Dimensionless forces on the upper faces of the slabs are determined for different air concentrations of the impinging jet. The effect of jet aeration entering the plunge pool on the uplift force applied in the lower faces of the slabs in the case where a waterstop failure occurs is also analysed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.686

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it