Cour pénale internationale et néocolonialisme : au-delà des évidences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le « néocolonialisme » de la Cour pénale internationale a été beaucoup critiqué, au motif que le procureur de la cpi se serait presque exclusivement intéressé à des affaires concernant le continent africain. Cet article tentera d’aller au-delà de la vision de ce néocolonialisme comme ressortissant uniquement d’une sur-représentation d’affaires africaines. Si néocolonialisme il y a, celui-ci tiendrait plus subtilement à un traitement postcolonial de l’Afrique à travers les catégories de la justice pénale internationale. Il importe de replacer les rapports justice pénale internationale / Afrique dans un « temps long » de l’introduction de la pensée et des pratiques pénales modernes sur le continent par le biais de la colonisation et de la construction de l’État postcolonial, notamment au regard de logiques d’exclusion/instrumentalisation/hybridation des formes de la justice traditionnelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".