System lag tests for augmented and virtual environments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe a simple technique for accurately calibrating the temporal lag in augmented and virtual environments within the Enhanced Virtual Hand Lab (EVHL), a collection of hardware and software to support research on goal-directed human hand motion. Lag is the sum of various delays in the data pipeline associated with sensing, processing, and displaying information from the physical world to produce an augmented or virtual world. Our main calibration technique uses a modified phonograph turntable to provide easily tracked periodic motion, reminiscent of the pendulum-based calibration technique of Liang, Shaw and Green. Measurements show a three-frame (50 ms) lag for the EVHL. A second technique, which uses a specialized analog sensor that is part of the EVHL, provides a "closed loop" calibration capable of sub-frame accuracy. Knowing the lag to sub-frame accuracy enables a predictive tracking scheme to compensate for the end-toend lag in the data pipeline. We describe both techniques and the EVHL environment in which they are used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it