MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998607233 · doi:10.1063/1.480666

Radial moments of the electron density: Gas phase results and the effects of solvation

2000· article· en· W1998607233 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Kent Worsnop, Russell J. Boyd, Jose M. Elorza, C. Sarasola, Jesús M. Ugalde

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
KeywordsSolvationBasis setQuadratic equationAb initioElectronDensity functional theoryAtomic physicsElectron densityChemistryGas phaseBasis (linear algebra)Computational chemistryMoleculePhysicsMolecular physicsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsPhysical chemistryGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The radial moments of the electron density, 〈rn〉, have been calculated for N2 and H2O at the quadratic configuration interaction (with singles and doubles) levels of theory by use of a variety of basis sets. An optimal basis set was chosen from the first set of calculations and then used with several conventional ab initio and density functional methods to compute the moments for a representative set of molecules: N2, CO, CH4, NH3, H2O, HF, SiH4, PH3, H2S, HCl, CH3OH, and CH3SH. The effects of solvation on the radial moments were also studied using the Onsager model and an extension of the Tomasi polarized continuum model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207