pCCSD: Parameterized coupled-cluster theory with single and double excitations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The primary characteristics of single reference coupled-cluster (CC) theory are size-extensivity and size-consistency, invariance under orbital rotations of the occupied or virtual space, the exactness of CC theory for N electron systems when the cluster operator is truncated to N-tuple excitations, and the relative insensitivity of CC theory to the choice of the reference determinant. In this work, we propose a continuous class of methods which display the desirable features of the coupled-cluster approach with single and double excitations (CCSD). These methods are closely related to the CCSD method itself and are inspired by the coupled electron pair approximation (CEPA). It is demonstrated that one can systematically improve upon CCSD and obtain geometries, harmonic vibrational frequencies, and total energies from a parameterized version of CCSD or pCCSD(α,β) by selecting a specific member from this continuous family of approaches. In particular, one finds that one such approach, the pCCSD(-1,1) method, is a significant improvement over CCSD for the calculation of equilibrium structures and harmonic frequencies. Moreover, this method behaves surprisingly well in the calculation of potential energy surfaces for single bond dissociation. It appears that this methodology has significant promise for chemical applications and may be particularly useful in applications to larger molecules within the framework of a high accuracy local correlation approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it