MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998696172 · doi:10.1109/vetecf.2010.5594462

A Modified Belief Propagation Algorithm Based on Attenuation of the Extrinsic LLR

2010· article· en· W1998696172 on OpenAlexaff
Liang Gong, Yin Xu, Bo Liu, Lin Gui, Bo Rong, Yiyan Wu, Wenjun Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBelief propagationAlgorithmLow-density parity-check codeDecoding methodsLogarithmSign (mathematics)Computer scienceJoint (building)Bit error rateSequential decodingMessage passingBerlekamp–Welch algorithmMathematicsBlock codeError floorEngineeringParallel computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a modification to Belief Propagation (BP) decoding algorithm for LDPC codes. The modification is to attenuate the check to bit extrinsic logarithm likelihood ratio by a factor α, when sudden sign change happens. This modification can be applied to both the standard BP algorithm and the joint row and column (JRC) BP algorithm. Simulation results show that the BER and WER performance of both traditional BP and JRC BP algorithms is improved by this method. The expense of the proposed modification is a slight increase in the average number of decoding iterations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207