15-F<sub>2t</sub>-isoprostane exacerbates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury of isolated rat hearts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species induce formation of 15-F(2t)-isoprostane (15-F(2t)-IsoP), a specific marker of in vivo lipid peroxidation, which is increased after myocardial ischemia and during the subsequent reperfusion. 15-F(2t)-IsoP possesses potent bioactivity under pathophysiological conditions. However, it remains unknown whether 15-F(2t)-IsoP, by itself, can influence myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Adult rat hearts were perfused by the Langendorff technique with Krebs-Henseleit (KH) solution at a constant flow rate of 10 ml/min. 15-F(2t)-IsoP (100 nM), SQ-29548 (1 microM, SQ), a thromboxane receptor antagonist that can abolish the vasoconstrictor effect of 15-F(2t)-IsoP, 15-F(2t)-IsoP + SQ in KH, or KH alone (vehicle control) was applied for 10 min before induction of 40 min of global ischemia followed by 60 min of reperfusion. During ischemia, saline (control), 15-F(2t)-IsoP, 15-F(2t)-IsoP + SQ, or SQ in saline was perfused through the aorta at 60 microl/min. 15-F(2t)-IsoP, 15-F(2t)-IsoP + SQ, or SQ in KH was infused during the first 15 min of reperfusion. Coronary effluent endothelin-1 concentrations were significantly higher in the group treated with 15-F(2t)-IsoP than in the control group during ischemia and also in the later phase of reperfusion (P < 0.05). Infusion of 15-F(2t)-IsoP increased release of cardiac-specific creatine kinase, reduced cardiac contractility during reperfusion, and increased myocardial infarct size relative to the control group. SQ abolished the deleterious effects of 15-F(2t)-IsoP. 15-F(2t)-IsoP exacerbates myocardial IRI and may, therefore, act as a mediator of IRI. 15-F(2t)-IsoP-induced endothelin-1 production during cardiac reperfusion may represent a mechanism underlying the deleterious actions of 15-F(2t)-IsoP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".