Influence of new deltorphin analogues on reinstatement of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate whether the δ-opioid receptors are involved in the rewarding and reinstatement effect of cocaine in the conditioned place preference (CPP) test. Male Wistar rats were conditioned with cocaine (5 mg/kg) or saline in a biased CPP procedure. The intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of naltrindole (5 nmol), δ-opioid receptor antagonist but not β-funaltrexamine (5 nmol), or nor-binaltorphimine (10 nmol), μ-opioid and κ-opioid receptor antagonists, respectively reversed the expression of the cocaine CPP. The i.c.v. administration of new analogues of deltorphins with potent agonist activity at δ-opioid receptors, such as cyclo(N, N-carbonyl-D-Orn, Orn)deltorphin (DEL-6) at the dose of 10 and 20 nmol and deltorphin II N-(ureidoethyl)amide (DK-4) at the dose of 10 and 20 nmol reinstated the rewarding effect of cocaine after extinction sessions in the CPP test. Naltrindole (5 nmol, i.c.v.) abolished the reinstated effect of DK-4 (10 nmol). In addition, DEL-6 and DK-4 induce anxiolytic-like effects in the elevated plus-maze test. However, neither peptide given alone either produced a rewarding effect in the CPP test, or influenced the locomotor activity and motor coordination, thus suggesting that these effects of peptides did not influence the results obtained in the reinstatement procedure of CPP. In conclusion, our results show that δ-opioid receptors play a dominant role in cocaine reward and reinstatement of cocaine seeking behavior in the CPP test.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".