Hydrogenated natural rubber blends: Aspect on thermal stability and oxidative behavior
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hydrogenated natural rubber (HNR) prepared from natural rubber (NR) is a new sustainable elastomer with excellent thermal properties. This study reports on the effect of vulcanization system and blend ratio on the thermal and oxidative resistance of HNR/NR vulcanizates. The various HNR/NR ratios vulcanized by peroxide and sulfur donor system exhibited the highest retention of tensile strength after thermal aging due to the formation of zinc‐dimethyldithiocarbamate (ZDMDC) which is an efficient antioxidant. The results from thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) indicated that the saturated structure of HNR had higher decomposition temperature and activation energy to enhance the thermal stability of HNR/NR vulcanizates. The initial and maximum decomposition temperatures of NR and HNR phases in vulcanizates were not affected by rubber blend ratio. This suggests that the decomposition pattern of HNR has no influence on another constituent. The increase in HNR content in the blends could retard the ozonolysis resulting in the surface cracking attacked by ozone. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".