Oxygen uptake kinetics: historical perspective and future directions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxygen uptake has been studied in the transitions between rest and exercise for more than 100 years, yet the mechanisms regulating the rate of increase in oxidative metabolism remain controversial. Some of the controversy is a consequence of incorrect interpretations of kinetic parameters describing amplitude and time constant relationships, whereas other factors relate to an incomplete framework for interpretation of experimental results. In this review, a new conceptual 3-dimensional model is proposed to explore the intracellular environment of skeletal muscle in the rest-to-exercise transition. The model incorporates the so-called "metabolic inertia" describing the increases in metabolic substrates and enzyme activation, along with the dynamic changes in intracellular partial pressure of oxygen (PO2). Considerable evidence exists during normal submaximal exercise challenges for an effect of changes in O2 delivery to working muscles affecting the intracellular PO2 (displayed on the x axis) and the high energy phosphate concentration (y axis) during steady-state exercise as well as the transitions from rest to exercise. The z axis incorporates a hypothetical description of metabolic inertia that is enhanced by increased enzyme activation and production of metabolic substrates. Specific examples are given that describe how this axis can affect oxygen uptake kinetics within the context of changing intracellular PO2 and energetic states. Oxidative metabolism at the onset of exercise is regulated by a dynamic balance of O2 transport and utilization mechanisms and is not limited solely by metabolic inertia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".