MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998752442 · doi:10.1139/y06-011

Long-duration freewheel running and submandibular lymphocyte response to forced exercise in older mice

2006· article· en· W1998752442 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Jeanette E. Boudreau, Laurie Hoffman‐Goetz

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Surface and Contact Lens
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMedicineTreadmillPhysical exerciseLymphocyteInternal medicineCD8EndocrinologyCD19Immune systemImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Submandibular lymph nodes (SLN) are crucial for immune surveillance of the anterior ocular chamber and upper respiratory tract; little is known about how training and exercise affect SLN lymphocytes. The intent of this study was to describe the impact of long term freewheel running followed by acute strenuous exercise on SLN lymphocytes in mice. Female C57BL/6 mice were assigned to running wheels or remained sedentary for 8 months, and further randomized to treadmill exercise and sacrifice immediately, treadmill exercise and sacrifice 24 h after exercise cessation, or no treadmill exposure. SLN lymphocytes were isolated and analyzed for CD3, CD4, CD8, and CD19 cell surface markers, phosphatidylserine externalization as a marker of apoptosis, and intracellular glutathione as a marker of oxidative stress. Compared with running wheel mice, older sedentary mice had a lower percent of T cells and higher percent of B cells (p < 0.05). Although intracellular glutathione did not differ between groups, running mice had a lower percent of Annexin V(+) SLN lymphocytes 24 h after treadmill exercise. Further research will be needed to determine if voluntary exercise translates into improved anterior ocular and upper respiratory tract health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicOcular Surface and Contact LensFrench-language works237,207