Analysis of the isothermal mechanical response of a shape memory polymer rheological model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, we derive the isothermal mechanical response of a 4‐element rheological model for shape memory polymers (SMP) in the context of (i) constant stress, (ii) constant strain, (iii) constant stress rate, (iv) constant strain rate, (v) periodic strain. The effect of shape memory strain (modeled by a friction element) and the temperature dependence of the material properties on the SMP response are examined for a polyurethane shape memory polymer of the polyester polypole series. In particular, it is possible to identify a threshold frequency during periodic loading, near which the damping capacity of the SMP is strongly affected by an increasing shape memory strain. On the other hand, when the applied frequency is much greater than the threshold value, an increasing shape memory strain ceases to have any effect on the damping. It is also shown that at a given frequency (significantly greater than the threshold value), the damping capacity as a function of temperature attains a maximum. While this maximum value is frequency‐dependent (being inversely proportional), the temperature at which the maximum is attained is frequency‐independent, and is analytically shown to be the glass transition temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".