MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998779213 · doi:10.1109/cisp.2011.6100607

Self-information weighting for image quality assessment

2011· article· en· W1998779213 on OpenAlexaff
Peng Peng, Ze-Nian Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoolingWeightingComputer scienceImage qualityArtificial intelligenceDistortion (music)Context (archaeology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Data miningSimilarity (geometry)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several recently proposed image quality assessment (IQA) methods involve a two-stage structure: local distortion measurement followed by pooling. Based on the hypothesis that more weights should be assigned to the image components that contain more information, this paper explored the potential of a Shannon Self-Information based pooling strategy, where self-information measures the “surprisal” of seeing a local image patch in the context of its surround. We combined the self-information based pooling strategy with the multi-scale structural similarity (MS-SSIM) index, yielding a self-information weighted SSIM (SI-SSIM) approach. Extensive evaluations based on six publicly available databases show that the proposed SI-SSIM approach achieves superior or comparable performance as compared with a number of competitive IQA algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207