Localization using multicarrier communication systems for Wireless Sensor Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A wireless sensor network (WSN) consists of spatially distributed autonomous tiny devices (nodes) using several sensors to cooperatively monitor physical or environmental conditions, such as temperature, lighting, sound, vibration, pressure, motion or pollutants, at different locations. Localization is very important for self-configuring WSNs and is essential to properly process the sensed data. In this paper, we discuss the special design considerations for WSN localization based on MultiCarrier (MC) communication systems. The Cramer-Rao Bound (CRB) is compared between the different ranging measurement techniques used in cooperative localization. We introduced Selective Duplication Technique (SDT) to optimize the MC system from WSN perspectives. SDT is considered as an extension to the sub-bands Duplication Technique (DT). The CRB for DT and SDT is examined to reflect the figure of merits achieved using the proposed SDT technique. Simulation results show significant performance improvements in localization accuracy using the proposed SDT technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".