Thai pharmacists’ understanding, attitudes, and perceived barriers related to providing pharmaceutical care
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pharmaceutical care is the philosophy of practice involving identifying, preventing, and resolving drug-related problems (DRPs) in order to improve patient outcomes.1 It signifies pharmacy practice’s shift from one that is drug product-oriented to one that is patient-oriented. Pharmaceutical care has been examined in hospital and community pharmacies. Through 2003, there were almost 1000 papers on the provision of care in community pharmacies on MEDLINE.2 The practice of pharmaceutical care in the ambulatory care practice setting over the past 25 years improved the clinical status of patients or maintained them in a stable status.3 Pharmaceutical care has been accepted among pharmacy professionals and adopted across countries in various forms and degrees.4 Although pharmaceutical care was initiated in the United States and has been practiced widely across the country, not all U.S. pharmacists have incorporated pharmaceutical care into routine practice.5 The implementation of pharmaceutical care in Canada, New Zealand, and some European countries is similar to the situation in the United States.6,–8
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".