MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998822533 · doi:10.1155/2007/41930

Fixed Points of Two-Sided Fractional Matrix Transformations

2007· article· en· W1998822533 on OpenAlexaff
David Handelman

Bibliographic record

VenueFixed Point Theory and Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMissing dataImage (mathematics)Fixed pointGraphCombinatoricsMathematical analysisComputer scienceStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex --> and "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex --> be "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex --> complex matrices, and consider the densely defined map "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex --> on "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex --> matrices. Its fixed points form a graph, which is generically (in terms of "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex -->) nonempty, and is generically the Johnson graph "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex -->; in the nongeneric case, either it is a retract of the Johnson graph, or there is a topological continuum of fixed points. Criteria for the presence of attractive or repulsive fixed points are obtained. If "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex --> and "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex --> are entrywise nonnegative and "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex --> is irreducible, then there are at most two nonnegative fixed points; if there are two, one is attractive, the other has a limited version of repulsiveness; if there is only one, this fixed point has a flow-through property. This leads to a numerical invariant for nonnegative matrices. Commuting pairs of these maps are classified by representations of a naturally appearing (discrete) group. Special cases (e.g., "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex --> is in the radical of the algebra generated by "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex --> and "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex -->) are discussed in detail. For invertible size two matrices, a fixed point exists for all choices of "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex --> if and only if "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex --> has distinct eigenvalues, but this fails for larger sizes. Many of the problems derived from the determination of harmonic functions on a class of Markov chains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFixed Point Theory and ApplicationsSame topicAdvanced Topics in AlgebraFrench-language works237,207