MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998826220 · doi:10.2118/109638-ms

Importance of Economic and Risk Analysis on Today's Petroleum Engineering Education

2007· article· en· W1998826220 on OpenAlexaff
J.C. Cunha

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Petroleum industryEconomic riskOrder (exchange)Investment (military)Engineering economicsRisk analysis (engineering)BusinessEngineeringMarketingComputer scienceFinancePoliticsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Graduate students in a master or PhD program tend to naturally concentrate their efforts on the understanding of theoretical issues related to their main research area of interest. This will frequently lead to a cultural shock when they, after concluding their program, enter or return to the job market. Commonly these professionals are asked to analyze, develop and/or implement projects based not only on technical premises but also on solid and very well supported economical feasibility studies. Frequently the common graduate academic background does not prepare students for those tasks. The importance of a thorough understanding of economic issues and associated risks is even more noticeable in the oil industry, where uncertainties related to oil and gas reserves, prices and government regulations make any long term project extremely risky. Based on the abovementioned factors, a graduate course was designed and implemented in order to prepare the students to deal with the main economic issues and challenges faced by the industry. Besides the basics on economic engineering, the course covers advanced material related to budgeting, scheduling and corporate planning. Monte Carlo simulation, economic decision tools, risk analysis for oil industry projects, investment risk and simulation, economic analysis of operations, production forecasts and its associated costs and expected profits are also studied. Furthermore, the students are also required to prepare a project where actual challenges from the industry are analyzed under the perspective of the risks and uncertainties involved. In the project, associated costs and economic results also have to be determined and scrutinized. All projects are presented in a seminar at the end of the course. In addition, a "Newsletter" analyzing current problems, challenges and industry development is produced weekly by the group during the duration of the course. These two tools, the project and the Newsletter, have raised in participants a great deal of interest for economic matters related to each one's individual area of expertise. The paper details the course experience providing examples of main projects developed as well as participants’ feedback.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207