MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Weighing Preterm Infants Before & After Breastfeeding

2002· article· en· W1998878687 on OpenAlexaff
Wendy A. Hall, Kim Shearer, Judith Mogan, Jonathan Berkowitz

Bibliographic record

VenueMCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfant Development and Preterm Care
Canadian institutionsChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British ColumbiaVancouver Native Health SocietyUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingMedicinePediatricsObstetricsPsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To determine whether weighing preterm infants before and after breastfeeding ("test weighing") affects maternal confidence and competence. METHODS: A longitudinal, repeated measures control group study. Sixty mothers of preterm infants were randomly assigned to a test weight or nontest weight group. In the test weight group, nurses weighed infants before and after every breastfeeding while they were in hospital. Maternal confidence and competence were measured four times: (a) at 3 days after the initiation of breastfeeding, (b) at infants' discharge from hospital, (c) at 1 week postdischarge, (d) at 4 weeks postdischarge. RESULTS: No significant differences in maternal confidence and competence at any of the measurement times were found. When change over time was examined using MANOVAs, the levels of competence and confidence in both groups had increased significantly. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The development of maternal confidence and competence in this group was independent of test weighing during hospitalization and calls into question claims that such interventions are necessary to develop competence or confidence in mothers of preterm infants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child NursingSame topicInfant Development and Preterm CareFrench-language works237,207