MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998901727 · doi:10.1002/ente.201500001

Heat‐Source and Evaporation Temperatures for the Organic Rankine Cycle

2015· article· en· W1998901727 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Technology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvaporatorOrganic Rankine cycleWorking fluidPinch pointDegree RankineEvaporationThermodynamicsMechanicsMaterials scienceChemistryPower (physics)PhysicsElectricity generationHeat exchanger

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study establishes an analytical model to investigate the pinch‐point temperature difference (PPTD) between the heat source and the working fluid in the evaporator of the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) to determine the position of the PPTD and the mass flow rate of the working fluid. Based on the analytical model, a theoretical formula of net output power is proposed to analyze the effects of the evaporation temperature. The results show that the effects of the evaporation temperature depend on the position of the PPTD, which can be determined directly by using the heat‐source temperature, and the characteristic temperature is regarded as constant for each working fluid. The results of the net power output and the optimal evaporation temperature are calculated by using these theoretical formulas and the simulation method for 11 working fluids. A comparison of the results verifies the accuracy of the formulas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it