MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998948355 · doi:10.1086/324193

Tidal Evolution of the Planetary System around HD 83443

2002· article· en· W1998948355 on OpenAlexaff
Yanqin Wu, Peter Goldreich

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPlanetExoplanetTidal accelerationAngular momentumAstronomyEccentricity (behavior)Orbital periodOrbital eccentricityAstrophysicsRADIUSPlanetary systemOrbital decayTidal heatingPerturbation (astronomy)Circular orbitStarsClassical mechanicsSatellite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two planets with an orbital period ratio of approximately 10:1 have been discovered around the star HD 83443. The inner and more massive planet, HD 83443b, has the smallest semimajor axis among all currently known exoplanets. Unlike other short-period exoplanets, it maintains a substantial orbital eccentricity, e_1 = 0.079 ± 0.008, in spite of efficient tidal damping. This is a consequence of its secular interactions with HD 83443_c, whose orbital eccentricity e_2 = 0.42 ± 0.06. Dissipation, associated with tides the star raises in the inner planet, removes energy but not angular momentum from its orbit, while secular interactions transfer angular momentum but not energy from the inner to the outer planet's orbit. The outward transfer of angular momentum decreases the tidal decay rate of the inner planet's orbital eccentricity while increasing that of the outer planet. The alignment of the apsides of the planets' orbits is another consequence of tidal and secular interactions. In this state the ratio of their orbital eccentricities, e_1/e_2, depends on the secular perturbations the planets exert on each other and on additional perturbations that enhance the inner planet's precession rate. Tidal and rotational distortions of the inner planet along with general relativity provide the most important of these extra precessional perturbations, each of which acts to reduce e_1/e_2. Provided the planets' orbits are coplanar, the observed eccentricity ratio uniquely relates sin i and C ≡ (k_2/k_(2J))(R_1/R_J)^5, where the tidal Love number, k_2, and radius, R_1, of the inner planet are scaled by their Jovian equivalents.
\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207