MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998977772 · doi:10.4000/ethiquepublique.1040

Éthique et gouvernance de l'offre de jeu : de la responsabilité ministérielle à la responsabilité sociale de Loto-Québec

2012· article· fr· W1998977772 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Yves Boisvert, Frédéric Lesemann, Élisabeth Papineau

Bibliographic record

VenueÉthique Publique · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicGambling Behavior and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce texte présente la synthèse des résultats de recherche de notre projet qui portait sur le rôle en matière de prévention des parties prenantes impliquées dans l’offre de jeu organisée au Québec. Dans cette recherche, nous désirions, dans la lignée de nos travaux précédents, tester la faisabilité et l’acceptabilité d’une culture de coresponsabilité chez les acteurs impliqués dans l’offre de jeu aux aînés. Ce texte s’inscrit directement dans le champ de l’éthique publique, car il propose une réflexion critique et pratique sur la place que doit occuper la responsabilité dans l’action publique et dans la gouvernance publique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.517
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉthique PubliqueSame topicGambling Behavior and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207