MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of sampling location and time, and host animal on assessment of bacterial diversity and fermentation parameters in the bovine rumen

2009· article· en· W1998981141 on OpenAlexaff
M. Li, G.B. Penner, Emma Hernandez‐Sanabria, M. Oba, Le Luo Guan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Microbiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRumenFermentationBiologyHost (biology)Sampling (signal processing)Diversity (politics)MicrobiologyBiotechnologyFood scienceEcologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: To investigate, using culture-independent methods, whether the ruminal bacterial structure, population and fermentation parameters differed between sampling locations and time. METHODS AND RESULTS: The detectable bacteria and fermentation parameters in the digesta from five locations in the rumen of three cows at three time points were analysed. The PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) profiles were similar among digesta samples from five locations (95.4%) and three time points (93.4%) within cows; however, a lower similarity was observed for samples collected from different host animals (85.5%). Rumen pH and concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFA) were affected by time points of sampling relative to feeding. CONCLUSIONS: The detectable bacterial structure in the rumen is highly conserved among different locations and over time, while the quantity of individual bacterial species may change diurnally in response to the feeding. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study supplies the fundamental understanding of the microbial ecology in the rumen, which is essential for manipulation of ruminal microflora and subsequent improvement in animal production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations247
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied MicrobiologySame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207