MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998998927 · doi:10.1063/1.1465422

Influence of inertia and topography in thin-cavity flow

2002· article· en· W1998998927 on OpenAlexaff
Mizanur R. Siddique, Roger E. Khayat

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInertiaPhysicsMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Cross section (physics)Groove (engineering)WavelengthAmplitudeRotary inertiaOpticsClassical mechanicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The influence of inertia and cavity topography is examined for the steady-state flow inside thin cavities of arbitrary shape. The problem is closely related to the die casting process. The flow is determined by solving the thin-film equations, using a coupled spectral/finite-difference method. The flows inside flat, contracting, and modulated cavities of rectangular cross section are examined. The interplay between inertia and cavity modulation is particularly emphasized. Regions of shear and elongation are identified; their size and location are strongly dependent on inertia and cavity thickness. The flow inside a grooved cavity (of nonrectangular cross section) is also investigated. In this case, the problem reduces to Poisson’s equation for the streamwise velocity component, and an exact solution is obtained, which is compared against the thin-film solution. The range of validity of the thin-film approximation is thus identified, and is influenced by the cross-section aspect ratio, the modulation (groove) amplitude and wavelength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207