MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999001673 · doi:10.1002/pssb.200844260

Coulomb oscillation of a proton in a Ti–Ni–Cu–H glassy alloy with multiple junctions

2008· article· en· W1999001673 on OpenAlexaff
Mikio Fukuhara, Shin‐ichi Yamaura, Akihisa Inoue

Bibliographic record

Venuephysica status solidi (b) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsOscillation (cell signaling)Materials scienceCoulombQuantum tunnellingProtonChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Following the discovery of Coulomb oscillation by the proton tunneling in Ni–Nb–Zr–H glassy alloys, we investigated the temperature‐dependent hydrogen effect of electric conduction of the (Ti50Ni25Cu25)100–x Hx (0 ≤ x ≤ 38.6) glassy alloys. Electric current‐induced voltage oscillation at 560 kHz was observed in the current–voltage curve of nanoscopic size tunnel junctions arranged in a low‐capacitance, multiple‐junction configuration of the glassy alloys in the temperature range of 333 K to 6 K. The typical Coulomb staircase in I–V characteristics indicates typical quantum dot tunneling at room temperature. This behavior appeared to be derived from Coulomb oscillation, based on proton resonance associated with the multiple‐junctions among Ti‐tetrahedral clusters belonging to each icosahedron‐like polyhedron in the Ni–Nb–Zr glassy alloys. (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuephysica status solidi (b)Same topicMetallic Glasses and Amorphous AlloysFrench-language works237,207