Naissance d’une élite : les médecins dans la société saguenayenne (1850-1940)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet essai reconstitue les efforts persistants et fructueux des médecins (et chirurgiens) du Saguenay pour se hisser au rang des élites régionales à partir de la seconde moitié du XIXe siècle. Au cours des premières décennies du peuplement, le corps médical se trouvait confronté à un double défi. Il devait d'abord structurer sa profession et ensuite la faire reconnaître dans une société largement sollicitée par les tâches de la colonisation et imprégnée de ses modes de vie. Ce double défi exigeait une triple accréditation, sur les plans scientifique, social et culturel. Selon la thèse défendue par l'auteur, la promotion sociale du médecin à l'époque considérée (1850-1940) s'est appuyée davantage sur des stratégies culturelles et sociopolitiques que sur des privilèges ou avantages économiques et strictement scientifiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".