MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999024143 · doi:10.1109/robio.2013.6739599

An improved extreme learning machine based on Variable-length Particle Swarm Optimization

2013· article· en· W1999024143 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationVariable (mathematics)Computer scienceExtreme learning machineMulti-swarm optimizationMetaheuristicMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) for Single-hidden Layer Feedforward Neural Network (SLFN) has been attracting attentions because of its faster learning speed and better generalization performance than those of the traditional gradient-based learning algorithms. However, it has been proven that generalization performance of ELM classifier depends critically on the number of hidden neurons and the random determination of the input weights and hidden biases. In this paper, we propose Variable-length Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm (VPSO) for ELM to automatically select the number of hidden neurons as well as corresponding input weights and hidden biases for maximizing ELM classifier's generalization performance. Experimental results have verified that the proposed VPSO-ELM scheme significantly improves the testing accuracy of classification problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning and ELMFrench-language works237,207