Injectable hyaluronic acid for the correction of HIV‐associated facial lipoatrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of Perlane, an injectable form of hyaluronic acid, for the correction of HIV-associated facial lipoatrophy. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective, observational study in a consecutive series of 18 HIV-positive males with facial lipoatrophy injected with Perlane. Fourteen patients were available for final analysis. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 12 months. Based on photographic analysis, there was a significant early improvement (P = 0.0035). This difference remained significant after 12 months (P = 0.04666); no significant difference in grade was shown between 1 and 12 months (P = 0.3693). Office assessments of improvement showed an early marked improvement in 85.8% of patients, and 78.6% of subjects demonstrated at least moderate improvement at 12 months. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Patient satisfaction was high, with only minor side effects and no late complications. Our findings support Perlane to be a feasible option for the provisional correction of mild to moderate facial lipoatrophy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".